Do you have some fantastic ideas on how we could enhance CareForIT?
Leave CareForIT feedback and let other users vote on your suggestion, the more votes received, the higher up the priority list the feature will go!
CareForIT will keep you updated if your suggestion makes its way on to our road map.
Any chance of the Care-4-IT Brokerage system being modified so that it shows a map
pinpointing the all of the providers locations, with an overlay pinpointing
the clients locations. Might give them (Providers) and us (the Brokers) a better idea for planning.
Logged on behalf of Allan Smith at Mears
I need the account/service user number on the standard invoice template and also the invoicing period to make the invoice suitable for the council I am dealing with
Does everyone use this standard CareFor Payroll Export when doing payroll?
If not, may I kindly ask what software you use to make this smaller.
Would a Payroll Summary not be more efficient?
Am I the only CareFor user that has 17 different job roles?
In my opinion, the summary report is a lot more efficient and more acceptable by payroll departments. The standard payroll export (see above) is flooded by zero cells and all the job roles (columns) and by simply removing these, or having the option to at least, is a no brainer. - for me at least. I know the job roles the staff have and do not require this when doing payroll.
I beg/implore/plead/kindly request you to like this post if you feel the same. I am mentally drained discussing this repeatedly and feel like I am alone in this issue.
ps, 'payroll export' and 'payroll summary' above are links with the relevant files attached.
Would like to have the ability to set Private Funder as a SELF FUNDER per area we work in. For Instance, self funded - Hull, self funded East Riding. I understand that self funder is hard coded into CareFor and hope that you will look into this possibility for us.
Is it possible to be able to filter all packages by the open tab so you can group no and yes together.
Thank you for your feedback it is much appreciated.
You will be glad to hear that we are planning to provide the requested functionality.
Please keep an eye out on our news section of the support site where we will provide an update when this is released.
This is the result of feedback on our online forum user echo
If you have any ideas of improvement you would like to see on eBrokerage please leave an idea here, or review an idea someone else has left and if you like it you can vote on it.
The message in box has individual names so it is not easy to know whom
has sent the email and as it does not list the clients number. It is a
monotony that could be solved if the emails went to the Providers generic
email address and the clients social ID was shown.
Providers receive a high number of e-mails from care-for-it eBrokerage each time there is a change in a POC. Would be useful to have some ability to configure the type of message received by providers in order to reduce the amount of emails.
Customer support service by UserEcho